04 June 2025

Mykolaiv court closes case on theft at southern Ukrainian oil refinery

(PHOTO: South Ukrainian NPP/Public)

The court closed the case of theft at the South Ukrainian NPP due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. Law enforcement officers have not identified the suspects since 2021.

According to the decision of the South Ukrainian Court of Mykolaiv Region, the criminal proceedings regarding the theft on the territory of the South Ukrainian NPP industrial zone committed in 2021 were closed. The reason was the expiration of the statute of limitations, and the perpetrators were never identified.

The incident occurred on July 5, 2021, when 22 galvanized flooring sheets with an area of more than 46 square meters were stolen from the territory of the nuclear power plant's industrial zone. The amount of damage, according to an independent expert, amounted to more than UAH 10 thousand.

During the pre-trial investigation, law enforcement officers inspected the scene, questioned witnesses and a representative of the injured party, and issued instructions to the operational unit. However, the person who committed the theft was not identified.

On April 15, 2025, a representative of the injured party, Energoatom, filed a motion with the court to replace the victim in the case with its successor, a joint-stock company represented by the South Ukrainian Nuclear Power Plant branch. The prosecutor supported the motion, and the company's representative did not object to the closure of the proceedings.

The court concluded that, in accordance with the CPC of Ukraine, the proceedings should be closed due to the expiration of the statute of limitations - in the case of minor crimes, this period is three years. No one has been notified of suspicion in the case, and the crime does not fall within the exceptions provided by law.

Recently, by contrast, the court granted investigators permission to seize documents from a company suspected of misappropriating budget funds allocated for the South Ukrainian NPP project.

According to the investigation, the company entered into an agreement to reconstruct the water supply system for the first three power units at the Tashlyk Reservoir. Law enforcement officers found out that the raw materials were purchased for UAH 20 per cubic meter, but were sold to the customer at UAH 420, a twentyfold markup. The case is being investigated within the framework of criminal proceedings under articles on fictitious entrepreneurship, money laundering, tax evasion and embezzlement of budget funds.

Анна Бальчінос

You may also like:

July 30, 2026

A company director with a prior conviction for alcohol theft has been charged with embezzlement in connection with renovation work at a museum in the Kherson region

The case of a former lawmaker from Mykolaiv accused of illegal maritime business has been referred to court

Court Removes Mykolaiv Utility Official for Leaking Procurement Data to a Business

The leader of the Kherson Yunarmiya will stand trial for the militarization of Ukrainian children

Parents demanded a shelter for the Academy of Children's Creativity in Mykolaiv

The Mykolaiv City Council transferred a plot of land located along the highway to Odesa to the state

The case involving millions in overpayments for school equipment in Odesa has been referred to court

A Kherson official is facing trial for transferring land in a resort area to a relative

A session of the Mykolaiv City Council was adjourned due to a lack of quorum

A Mykolaiv businessman avoided prison for a scheme to supply parts to Russia

In Mykolaiv, lawmakers are summoning the management of Mykolaivelektrotrans over a controversial procurement

In the Mykolaiv region, the prosecutor's office obtained a court order to seize 32 hectares of pastureland from an unscrupulous tenant

What's the difference between maternity support belts used before and after childbirth? Advertisement

An audit of assets written off over the past five years has been launched in Mykolaiv

July 29, 2026

A new judge has been nominated to the Odessa Court of Appeals