Sept. 1, 2025, 6:45 p.m.

Judge from Kherson region appeals against dismissal sentence

(Judge of the Bilozersky District Court Anna Bila-Kyselova. PHOTO: zib.com.ua)

The judge of the Bilozersky District Court appealed her dismissal. She insists on canceling the evaluation and the actions of the commissions that led to her dismissal.

This was reported by Most.

Judge of the Bilozersky District Court Anna Bila-Kyselova filed a lawsuit with the Supreme Court, acting as a court of first instance, demanding to cancel the decisions of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (HQCJ) and the High Council of Justice (HCJ), which dismissed her from office.

The lawsuit was filed back in May 2025, but the case is still pending. The judge demands that the HQCJ interview held on January 17, 2024, as part of the qualification assessment, be declared illegal, as it allegedly violated Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine and led to her unconstitutional removal from office.

Anna Bila-Kyselova also asks the court to establish that the HQCJ rapporteur Volkova and the commission members lack the authority to assess her suitability for the position. According to the judge, the HQCJ's actions in granting the Public Integrity Council representatives access to the full dossier in 2023-2024 were unlawful, and the decision should be canceled.

The HQCJ and the HCJ recognized the judge as unfit for office and submitted a motion for her dismissal. According to the Public Integrity Council, in 2016 and 2021, Bila-Kyselova visited the occupied Crimea and had contact with the occupiers. In addition, a person with a completely identical full name had a Russian identification number. On April 30, 2024, the HCJ officially dismissed the judge from her post.

In the lawsuit, the judge also asked for separate rulings in connection with the discovery of what she believed to be forged documents in the dossier, as well as the disclosure of personal data by HQCJ employees and Commission member Volkova.

On July 8, 2025, the Administrative Court of Cassation returned her claim. The plaintiff disagreed with the decision and filed an appeal with the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court demanding that the decision of the Cassation Court be overturned and the case be referred to the court of first instance.

In June, President Zelenskyy signed decrees appointing new judges in several regions of the country. Among the appointees are three female judges who will now administer justice in Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Kherson regions.e The cases were suspended due to formal errors, and the court left the application without motion.

Анна Бальчінос

You might also like:

Jan. 22, 2026

The Cabinet of Ministers has agreed on a mechanism of payments for farmers from Kherson region

Kherson resident kept child pornography and molested her son

Jan. 21, 2026

In Kherson region, the head of the village VA stopped paying bonuses

Millions of losses in education: how school construction in Kherson region became a corruption trap

Ambulance service became a paid service in Kherson region

Chief of Staff of the Black Sea Court sent to jail for bribery

Official from Kherson region embezzled millions on supply of low-quality overalls

Jan. 20, 2026

Kherson Prosecutor's Office denies allegations of pressure on authorities

Head of Corruption Prevention Department of Odesa City Council Resigns

Rescuer from Kherson region gets 14 years in prison for rescuing occupiers

Jan. 19, 2026

Bonuses and compensations: how much did the heads of Kherson prosecutor's office earn?

Repair of the shelter for the therapeutic building of the hospital in Kherson was estimated at 165 million

Cash, salary, and real estate: what the deputy head of Kherson MBA declared when she left the company

The AMCU forced Khersonteploenergo to change the terms of the tender due to the company's complaint

Kherson Prosecutor's Office sues theater over festival funds