Oct. 10, 2024, 7:32 p.m.
(Serhii (younger) and Serhii (older) Parashchenko. Photo: Parashchenko senior's Facebook page)
Odesa Regional Council deputy Serhiy Parashchenko Sr. has again received dividends from an agricultural firm, and his son Serhiy Parashchenko Jr. who is also a deputy, recently mentioned a house and land, the sale of combines, and loans in his 2021 declaration.
This was reported by the Center for Public Investigations.
In September 2024, the private enterprise Agrofirma Tashlyk transferred UAH 363,452 to Parashchenko senior. Parashchenko senior is the beneficiary of Tashlyk.
In October 2024,Parashchenko junior updated his declaration for 2021.
In the "real estate objects" section, he indicated a residential building of more than 250 square meters with a land plot of 12.5 acres in the village of Vynohradivka, Bolhradskyi district. He received all this for free from his mother.
It should be noted that Serhiy Parashchenko Sr. has been included in the ranking of the richest deputies of the regional council from the CPR twice. And both times he was among the top five landowners.
Parashchenko junior also mentioned that he had sold two combines through a commission agreement with a private enterprise.
The politician also updated the section "Banking and other financial institutions, including abroad, where the declarant or his family members have accounts or keep funds and other property", indicating Bank Vostok and Raiffeisen.
In the section "Financial liabilities" there are eight new loans that were not listed before. Parashchenko took them from companies owned by the family - Khliborob, Burgudzhi Agrofirm, and Nigma Farm.
Earlier, the CPR reported that in August and June 2024, the <b>Parashchenko</b> deputies of the Odesa Regional Council received UAH 2.2 million from their farming enterprises.
Recently, during the NACP's inspection of declarations, it turned out that only one declaration out of all those checked had no violations. In some cases, the declarations violated two articles at once. 7 declarations also have signs of illicit enrichment totaling UAH 146.3 million (Article 368-5 of the Criminal Code). In another 8 documents, officials could not explain the origin of money in the amount of UAH 30.1 million (Article 290 of the Civil Procedure Code).
Ірина Глухова