10 August 2025

Court of Appeal in Odesa says mobilization is not irreversible

(Photo collage: Intent)

The Fifth Administrative Court of Appeal, based in Odesa, upheld the decision of the Mykolaiv court, which had canceled the order of the head of the territorial recruitment center to conscript a man and ordered the military unit to remove him from the personnel lists.

The judges emphasized that the Supreme Court's position on the irreversibility of illegal mobilization is not a position in an exemplary case, meaning that it should not be applied in all cases, the Judicial and Legal Newspaper reported.

The story began in November 2024. An employee of a limited liability company came to the territorial recruitment center to clarify his military registration data. He was found fit, drafted and sent for military service. However, the man went to court because he was booked until July 22, 2025, at the request of the LLC, and the TCC was informed of this.

On February 28, 2025, the Mykolaiv District Administrative Court upheld the claim. The court proceeded from the fact that the plaintiff cannot be held liable for the proper communication of information about the postponement to the defendant, since such a procedure depends on communication between the company where the plaintiff works, and not on the actions of the plaintiff, and therefore concluded that the order of the head of the TCC was unlawful and should be canceled.

The military unit filed an appeal, in which it argued that the illegal conscription was irreversible, citing the well-known conclusions of the Supreme Court in its decision of February 5, 2025 in case 160/2592/23.

However, as the Fifth Administrative Court of Appeal noted in its decision, in the case considered by the Supreme Court, the plaintiff-soldier's main focus was on the fact that he had not passed a military medical examination. However, in the case from Mykolaiv court, the subject of the trial was not the examination of the procedure for conducting the MEC or other actions or inactions of the district MEC, i.e., the cases are not identical.

Кирило Бойко

You may also like:

June 6, 2026

Companies from Chornomorsk exposed for collusion in tender procedures

12 soldiers from Odesa region return from captivity

The work of an Odessan woman was included in the longlist of the World Illustration Awards 2026

20 dead dolphins washed up on the coast of Odesa region

A book about Odesa through the eyes of Pinkerton was presented at the Bookstore-Café

SBU exposes Russian general for shelling Mykolaiv regional council

Conflict with the TCC in Odesa ended in shots fired

Hotel in Odesa region left without roof as a result of Russian attack

Ochakiv resident sentenced for trading influence with SBU for bribe

What is the Executive Committee of Odesa City Council and how it is formed

June 5, 2026

Case on fictitious disability for 16 thousand dollars sent to court in Odesa

Case of negligence of technical supervision engineer sent to court in Odesa

Mykolaiv hospital directors' estates: who declared 300 square meters of housing

Ukraine returns 185 war prisoners from Russian capture

State Emergency Service dispatcher from Mykolaiv pleads guilty to evading service