10 November 2026, 20:05
The asset declaration of an official at the Mykolaiv Treasury did not pass the NACP's review
Ця стаття також доступна українською
PHOTO: Sh
The National Agency for Corruption Prevention has identified inaccurate information in the 2025 declaration of Iryna Stiranko, a senior specialist with the Main Directorate of the State Treasury Service of Ukraine in the Mykolaiv region. Specifically, the official failed to disclose certain information regarding the bank accounts and assets of her husband, who lives and works in Malaysia.
This is stated in the NACP’s report on the results of a comprehensive review of the declaration, dated November 6, 2026.
During the audit, the agency determined that the official’s husband left Ukraine on November 14, 2024, via the “Reni” border crossing and did not return during 2025. In her explanations, Iryna Stiranko noted that her husband resides in Malaysia, where his employer provides him with housing free of charge. He also holds a work visa valid until July 23, 2027.
At the same time, the declaration did not include any information about her husband’s bank accounts. According to information the NACP received from the bank, as of the end of 2025, his accounts at PrivatBank held 103,227.71 hryvnias, 5,825.02 euros, and 4,659.21 U.S. dollars.
In addition, the agency determined that the man received a pension of 251,000 hryvnias in 2025; however, this information was also missing from the declaration. The audit was unable to determine the type and amount of income he may have received abroad.
Among other discrepancies, the NACP noted an incorrect VIN code for a 2020 Volkswagen Jetta and inaccuracies in the information regarding income and financial assets. Specifically, the official reported 14 hryvnias in income from dividends, while the bank confirmed that this amount had been credited as interest.
As a result, the NACP determined that the declaration contained inaccurate information in several sections. At the same time, the agency found no evidence of an administrative offense under Article 172-6 of the Code of Administrative Offenses or a criminal offense under Article 366-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Furthermore, no evidence of illicit enrichment, unjustified assets, or violations related to conflicts of interest was found.
