12 November 2026, 11:31
The head of the State Emergency Service detachment in Odesa Oblast concealed his wife's vehicle fleet
Ця стаття також доступна українською
PHOTO COLLAGE: sud.ua
The National Agency for Corruption Prevention (NAZK) uncovered false information totaling 941,000 hryvnias in the asset declaration of Andriy Skrypnychenko, the head of the State Emergency Service (SES) detachment in Odesa Oblast. The audit covered his family’s real estate, vehicles, income, and bank accounts.
The Center for Public Investigations examined the NACP’s findings.
The National Agency for Corruption Prevention has completed a full audit of the official’s 2025 declaration.
Most of the false information concerned his wife’s property. Specifically, the declaration failed to list nine land plots and a 36-square-meter garage belonging to the official’s wife. Their total value is 671,800 hryvnias. The wife also used 15 additional land plots under lease and emphyteusis agreements. All plots are located primarily in the Kryvoozerskyi District of Mykolaiv Oblast.
The official also failed to declare three of his wife’s vehicles: a 2012 Toyota Camry worth 200,000 hryvnias, a trailer, and a 2010 Skoda Octavia worth over 146,000 hryvnias.
Read the full version on the CPR website: An official with the State Emergency Service in Odesa Oblast failed to declare 24 family-owned land plots
In addition, the National Agency for Corruption Prevention (NAZK) uncovered his wife’s undeclared income from the sale of two land plots. In total, she received nearly 220,000 hryvnias. The official was aware of these transactions, as he personally provided notarized consents for the sale of the property.
The audit also revealed inaccuracies in the information regarding social benefits, rental income, bank accounts, and real estate used by the declarant himself.
At the same time, the official stated that although he has been married since 2010, the marital relationship had effectively ended. According to him, his wife did not provide information about her income or property. However, the NACP determined that he was aware of some of his wife’s property transactions.
See also: NACP Discovers Inaccurate Information in the Declaration of an Odesa TCC Official
The agency found no evidence of illicit enrichment, unjustified assets, or a conflict of interest. However, the amount of false information exceeded 150 subsistence minimums for able-bodied individuals. Based on its findings, the agency determined that there were signs of an administrative offense.
